Eight client work examples — seven anonymized, one public.
Contract engagements across infrastructure, platform, and product · NDA-bound, so clients are not named. The one exception is Iguazio, below, which appears under its own name because it was an employer engagement that is already public in the experience section of this site. Every number here is one that also appears there — nothing is rounded up for the occasion.
Projected $40K+/day burn contained within 72 hours. No recurrence reported during the engagement.
The $40K/day figure is a projected run-rate, not a claim that a full day of that spend was invoiced. This write-up describes one production incident and the controls shipped during the response.
250-450 concurrent agent instances in production. Release overhead down roughly 40%.
This is a summary of platform engagements across multiple clients, not a benchmark of one installation. The concurrency range and release-overhead figures below describe the published engagement results.
Reliability program: SLO frameworks for three platforms
Client.
Three client platforms running multi-agent systems in production.
Engagement.
Reliability advisory · two quarters.
The problem. Teams were operating production agents without agreed reliability targets — every incident was argued over opinion instead of data, and improvements could not be measured.
What we shipped
Defined SLO frameworks on task completion rate, mean tool calls, hallucination escape rate, and end-to-end latency.
Tied error budgets to each objective, with agent trace instrumentation feeding the dashboards.
Result
SLO compliance improved from 71% to 96% over two quarters.
Platform running heavy tool-use agents in production.
Engagement.
Audit and build · production hardening.
The problem. A retrieval and governance layer that had grown ad hoc: no deterministic validation on tool calls, no visibility into what agents were actually invoking, and no evidence of enforcement for security review.
What we shipped
Audited the retrieval stack on Pinecone and OpenSearch and rebuilt the ingestion and query paths.
Enforced deterministic policy validation on every tool call, with zero known bypasses across deployments.
Result
1.8M+ tool invocations running under policy validation.
$200K/yr aggregate reduction in cloud and LLM spend.
The $200K/year figure is aggregate cloud and LLM spend reduction across advisory engagements. It is not the result of a single sprint, a promised saving, or a measured percentage applicable to every workload.
The problem. Data lakes and model registries that had diverged across platforms, making model lineage and dataset governance inconsistent.
What we shipped
Standardized data lakes and model registries across both platforms, integrating Databricks and Domino Data Lab with existing workloads in scikit-learn, PyTorch, and TensorFlow.
Result
One data and model lifecycle across both platforms.
Systems engineering · Jan. 2026 - Jul. 2026. Independent advisory work was paused during this role.
The problem. A production trading system for prediction markets pulling live data from centralized exchanges and on-chain sources, with hard risk controls and sub-10ms peak latency requirements, trading real capital.
What we shipped
Designed and ran event-driven Python and Rust pipelines holding sub-10ms latency at peak load.
Designed the live risk-control layer: position limits, daily loss limits, and slippage checks enforced on every order.
Built statistical models of market order flow to detect volatility clustering, and used them to size trades and set execution pace under fast-moving conditions.
Implemented Kelly-criterion position sizing that scales exposure to model confidence.
Maintained the research pipeline: historical backfill, detector-faithful backtesting, walk-forward validation, and automated signal outcome labeling.
Iguazio AI: inference platform engineering at scale
Client.
Iguazio AI (employer engagement · public on this site) · remote contractor.
Engagement.
Jun. 2021 - Mar. 2023.
The problem. Enterprise NLP and computer-vision inference workloads on a monolithic FastAPI service: 18-minute cold starts, a 900ms+ p99 on core analytics queries, and no canary rollout path.
What we shipped
Deployed and operated a multi-GPU Triton Inference Server cluster with dynamic batching and model quantization, with inference SLOs and Prometheus/Grafana alerting runbooks for OOM failures.
Decomposed the monolith into event-driven microservices on Docker, PostgreSQL, and Kafka.
Owned schema and indexing strategy for behavioral analytics datasets across three product teams; redesigned indexes and materialized views.
Engineered GitOps CI/CD with GitHub Actions and ArgoCD, automated health checks, and canary rollout policies.
Result
Cold-start deployment time from 18 minutes to under 4.
p99 query latency from over 900ms to 120ms.
99.9% uptime sustained across production containerized environments.
Each of these engagement types has shipped in production. If one of them looks like your situation, fifteen minutes will establish whether it actually is.
Send me what you're building if you would rather scope by email first. References from prior clients are available on the call, or by email afterwards — they do not go on a website.